EV Lifespan & End-of-Life Problems
1. Battery lifespan isn’t forever
Most EV batteries last 8–15 years depending on:
heat
charging habits
mileage
manufacturing quality
After that, range drops — sometimes dramatically — and battery replacement can cost ₹4–10 lakh+ (or more globally $5,000–$20,000).
So older EVs often become economically unrepairable.
Meaning → scrapyard.
2. EV batteries are NOT eco-friendly to produce
They require:
Lithium
Cobalt
Nickel
Graphite
Rare-earth metals
Which means:
✔ Deep mining
✔ Groundwater depletion
✔ Chemical pollution
✔ Deforestation
✔ Child & unsafe labour in some regions
So yes — the “green” EV depends on some very dirty realities.
3. Recycling batteries is still a big unsolved problem
Battery recycling today is:
❌ Expensive
❌ Technically complex
❌ Energy intensive
❌ Done at very small scale globally
Many early EV batteries have already ended up in:
landfills
informal scrap markets
developing countries for cheap disposal
And when damaged → they can catch fire.
The concern about “dump yards” is real — especially as millions of EVs age out together.
So are EVs really environmentally friendly?
The honest answer:
📌 They are better than petrol cars — only if:
electricity comes from clean energy
battery life is long
recycling improves
supply chains are ethical
📌 But today…
many countries still use coal-based power, weak recycling systems, and dirty mining.
So calling EVs fully green is misleading.
They are a partial improvement — not a clean cure.
5. What’s not talked about enough
🚫 EVs don't solve:
traffic
resource depletion
over-consumption
urban planning failure
They simply replace one type of machine with another.
Meanwhile:
✔ Smaller vehicles
✔ Public transit
✔ Walking + cycling
✔ Local economies
…have far greater environmental benefit.
But those don’t generate billion-dollar profits — EV hype does.
Why the “EV = Green” narrative exists
Because it benefits:
automakers
tech companies
governments seeking climate credit
investors
And it gives consumers a guilt-free way to keep buying cars.
It’s not a conspiracy — but it is convenient marketing.
7. What’s the fair, nuanced truth?
🌱 EVs:
✔ reduce city air pollution
✔ reduce oil dependency
✔ reduce lifetime CO₂ emissions (in many regions)
❌ But they:
✘ still damage the environment
✘ still create waste
✘ still require global extraction industries
✘ still end up in scrap yards if policies fail
So:
EVs are “less bad,” not “good.”
And pretending otherwise is dishonest.
8. The real sustainable direction looks like:
durable long-life batteries
modular replaceable parts
standardized recycling systems
second-life grid storage
renewable power
fewer cars overall
better public transit
urban planning that reduces car dependence
So... here we go...
global automakers hit the brakes on their electric vehicle plans
- Ford took a $19.5 billion charge in December 2025 to cancel or delay several EV programs (including large three-row SUVs and reducing focus on the F-150 Lightning), shifting resources elsewhere.
- General Motors (GM) paused expansions, reduced output at key EV factories (e.g., Spring Hill, Tennessee), and took $1.6 billion in charges, while deprioritizing rapid scaling.
- Stellantis canceled the Ram 1500 REV electric pickup, delayed the Ramcharger extended-range EV to later in 2026, and trimmed lower-trim EV versions (e.g., Dodge Charger Daytona).
- Volkswagen discontinued models like the ID.7 and paused ID. Buzz production in the U.S., citing challenging EV market conditions.
- Mercedes-Benz axed entry-level EVs like the EQB for 2026 and paused U.S.-bound EQE/EQS production.
Other cancellations include Chevrolet BrightDrop vans, Nissan Ariya (paused in U.S.), and various planned models from Honda, Kia, and Dodge.
Overall, most major automakers launched no significant new EVs in 2026—a sharp contrast to prior years—and EV market share growth has stalled, with sales declining in late 2025 after incentives ended.
