Relationship between WHO, Rockefeller and Allopathy medical science - and lastly their influence on Bharat...

The relationship between the WHO, Rockefeller and Allopathy medical science is often discussed in the context of the historical evolution of global health, influence of philanthrocapilist funding, and debates over healthcare models. Here's a grounded, factual overview:

1. Rockefeller & the Rise of Allopathic Medicine

• In the early 20th century, John D. Rockefeller, through the Rockefeller Foundation, played a pivotal role in shaping modern medicine in the West.

• Rockefeller's wealth, originating from Standard Oil, was channeled into medical education reform.

• The Flexner Report (1910), funded indirectly by Rockefeller interests, recommended standardizing medical education around scientific, research-driven, pharmaceutical-based (allopathic) approaches.

• This led to the rise of allopathic medicine, focused on symptom treatment with drugs and surgery, while homeopathy, naturopathy, and traditional systems were sidelined in Western countries.

2. Rockefeller's Influence on Global Health

• The Rockefeller Foundation also funded global health initiatives, focusing on eradicating diseases like hookworm and malaria.

• Their model emphasized scientific medicine, public health infrastructure, and partnerships with governments, influencing how modern healthcare systems developed worldwide.

3. The WHO and Philanthrocapitalist Influence

• Founded in 1948, the World Health Organization (WHO) is a UN agency coordinating international public health.

• Over the decades, private foundations, including the Rockefeller Foundation and more recently the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, have contributed significant funding to the WHO.

• Such funding influences which health priorities — like vaccination programs, pharmaceutical approaches, etc. — receive focus.

4. Reality

• Private philanthropy has created biases, overemphasizing pharmaceutical-driven solutions while neglecting traditional medicine, preventive care, or localized health approaches.

• It's a coordinated agenda between the WHO and Rockefeller to control global health.

Summary

✔ The Rockefeller Foundation played a historic role in promoting allopathic, pharmaceutical-centered medicine.
✔ The WHO has been shaped by both public and private funding, including Rockefeller's.
✔ The dominance of allopathic medicine is partly a result of this early philanthrocapitalist influence, but also due to its alignment with scientific methods and pharmaceutical advancements.

Watch... all are connected...

You just have to join the dots...

The Indian perspective — impact on Ayurveda and indigenous systems...

1. Pre-Colonial India — Indigenous Medical Dominance

• India has a rich tradition of Ayurveda, Siddha,Yoga, and various tribal medical systems, practiced for thousands of years.

• These systems emphasized holistic health, preventive care, diet, herbal medicine, and mind-body balance.

2. British Colonial Era — The Decline Begins

• British rule introduced Western allopathic medicine in India, establishing medical colleges and hospitals based on European models.

• Indigenous systems were marginalized as 'unscientific', though they remained popular among the masses.

3. Rockefeller Influence in India

• In the early 20th century, the Rockefeller Foundation began funding health initiatives in India, focusing on:

  ✔ Controlling infectious diseases (e.g., hookworm, malaria)
  ✔ Promoting Western medical education and public health infrastructure
  ✔ Supporting scientific, pharmaceutical-based approaches, aligned with allopathy

• While these efforts helped improve public health, they also reinforced the narrative that modern medicine = allopathy, sidelining traditional knowledge.

4. WHO & Global Health in India

• After India's independence (1947), the WHO played a significant role in shaping health policy:

  ✔ Supporting vaccination campaigns, disease eradication (e.g., smallpox)
  ✔ Promoting biomedical research and allopathic healthcare
  ✔ Limited focus on integrating Ayurveda or indigenous knowledge into mainstream health systems

5. The Marginalization of Ayurveda

• Ayurveda and other Indian systems were largely excluded from formal education, global recognition, and health budgets, except as "alternative" or "complementary" options.

• Western pharmaceutical companies, influenced by the global allopathic model, dominated drug development, while India's traditional medicine remained underfunded.

6. Recent Revival & Resistance

In recent decades:

✔ India has revived interest in Ayurveda through the Ministry of AYUSH (established in 2014).
✔ Global interest in natural, plant-based, and holistic healthcare has grown.
✔ However, organizations like WHO still primarily promote evidence-based, pharmaceutical-driven healthcare, with limited formal integration of Ayurveda.

India continues to push for:

• Greater global recognition of Ayurveda

• Scientific validation of traditional knowledge

• Protection of indigenous medicinal biodiversity

7. Balanced Indian Perspective

• India's health future lies in balanced integration:

  ✔ Modern allopathy for emergencies, surgery, infectious diseases
  ✔ Ayurveda and indigenous systems for chronic care, prevention, lifestyle management

Ignoring either approach weakens the overall healthcare fabric.

Summary

• Western philanthrocapitalist and institutional influence promoted allopathic dominance in India.

• This marginalized Ayurveda for decades.

• Bharat is now reasserting its ancient medical heritage, aiming for scientific validation, global recognition, and integrated healthcare.

Let's end this write up with this conundrum of the medical profession.