Hindi Chini Bhai Bhai - once again...

Competition should not become conflict - the message is clear and unequivocally stated. 

Will the two largest nations of the global south - Bharat and China - be together form a force to be reckoned with?

The ascendance of BRICS, the probable fall of mighty dollar, the end of petrodollar, the fast tracked dedollarization process, Russia' s indomitable courage to face NATO on the battlefield, the possible fall of European union, and most notably, with the probable fall of USA hegemony in the new world order - the recent bonhomie between India and China is significant in many ways.

It's like - United we stand - divided we fall.

Both the nations, Bharat and China must work together to play important roles in a non-unipolar global stage.

We cannot afford to be hostile to each other. With the threat of tariff of USA of about 30 percent looming large on both Bharat and China, maybe Bharat will lift the ban on FDI from China which was created in 2020 following a direct conflict between these two nations.

But that was the past - the bygone - we have learnt our lessons and that's it. Let's close that chapter. Let's create a win-win situation for these two large nations of the universe.

According to Modiji... China is our future.

And maybe he is right.

Bharat and China share a relationship from ancient times - when Bharat was considered as the Sone ka Chiriya - the golden bird. 

Ancient Bharat (India) was visited by several notable Chinese travelers, primarily Buddhist monks, who documented their journeys and provided valuable insights into Indian society, religion, and culture. Some of the most famous Chinese travelers to India were:

1. Faxian (Fa-Hien) (337–422 CE)

• Purpose: Faxian traveled to India during the Gupta Empire (around 399–412 CE) to collect Buddhist scriptures.

• Journey: He visited Pataliputra (modern-day Patna), Mathura, Kapilavastu, and Lumbini, and spent time at Nalanda and Bodh Gaya.

• Observations: Faxian described Indian governance, law, and the flourishing Buddhist monasteries. He noted that people lived peacefully, and crime was rare.

2. Xuanzang (Hsüan-Tsang) (602–664 CE)

• Purpose: Xuanzang traveled to India between 629–645 CE during the reign of King Harsha to study Buddhism and collect scriptures.

• Journey: He visited Nalanda, Varanasi, Bodh Gaya, Rajgir, Pataliputra, and Kashmir.

• Observations: He provided detailed accounts of Indian society, economy, caste system, and religious diversity. He admired Nalanda University as a great center of learning.

• Book: His travelogue "Great Tang Records on the Western Regions" became a crucial historical source.

3. Yijing (I-Tsing) (635–713 CE)

• Purpose: He traveled to India between 673–695 CE to study Buddhist texts.

• Journey: He stayed in Nalanda and Tamralipti (Bengal) for several years.

• Observations: He wrote about Buddhist customs, monastic life, and the knowledge system of Indian scholars.

• Book: His writings, such as "A Record of Buddhist Practices Sent Home from the Southern Seas", provide detailed descriptions of Indian religious life.

Significance of Their Travels

• These travelers played a crucial role in transmitting Indian Buddhist teachings to China.

• They documented historical, political, and cultural aspects of ancient India, providing valuable records for historians.

• They helped in the spread of Buddhism and strengthened cultural exchanges between India and China.

So.... let's recreate the old vibe of Bharat - the original Bharat. Let's welcome the wind of change in the new world order.

Let's enjoy the close dance between the dragon and the elephant...

Jai Hind.... Jai Bharat...

Are Hindus of Bharat suffering from Stockholm Syndrome - a psychological paradox?

Perception matters...

Stockholm Syndrome is a fascinating and complex psychological phenomenon in which hostages or victims of abuse develop an emotional bond with their captors or abusers. Named after a 1973 bank robbery in Stockholm, Sweden, this condition challenges conventional notions of survival, loyalty, and human relationships. It reveals the intricate ways in which the mind copes with extreme stress and power imbalances, often defying logic and eliciting both intrigue and debate among psychologists, criminologists, and the public alike.

The origins of Stockholm Syndrome trace back to an event that unfolded on August 23, 1973, when a man named Jan-Erik Olsson stormed into the Kreditbanken in Stockholm and took four employees hostage. Over the course of six days, the hostages were subjected to intense fear and uncertainty. Yet, surprisingly, they began to form an attachment to Olsson and his accomplice, Clark Olofsson. The hostages resisted rescue attempts, and after their release, some even defended their captors, refusing to testify against them. One hostage reportedly became engaged to Olofsson years later. This bewildering behavior caught the attention of psychiatrist Nils Bejerot, who coined the term “Stockholm Syndrome” to describe it.

At its core, Stockholm Syndrome is understood as a survival mechanism. When individuals are trapped in life-threatening situations with no apparent means of escape, their psyche may adapt by aligning with the very source of their danger. This bond often emerges from a combination of factors: fear of death, dependence on the captor for basic needs, and small acts of kindness from the captor amidst the terror. For instance, if a captor spares a victim’s life or provides food, the victim may interpret this as benevolence, fostering gratitude and loyalty. Over time, this dynamic can blur the lines between victim and perpetrator, creating a paradoxical sense of trust.

Psychologically, Stockholm Syndrome is linked to trauma bonding and cognitive dissonance. Trauma bonding occurs when a victim becomes emotionally attached to an abuser through cycles of cruelty and kindness, a pattern often seen in abusive relationships beyond hostage scenarios. Cognitive dissonance, meanwhile, describes the mental discomfort of holding conflicting beliefs—such as recognizing a captor as a threat yet feeling affection toward them. To resolve this tension, the victim may rationalize the captor’s actions, perceiving them as less malevolent than they are. This coping strategy can preserve a sense of safety and control in an otherwise helpless situation.

Stockholm Syndrome is not officially classified as a mental disorder in diagnostic manuals like the DSM-5, but it shares traits with conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and dependent personality disorder. Its manifestations vary widely. In some cases, victims exhibit overt sympathy for their captors, as seen in the Stockholm robbery or the 1974 kidnapping of heiress Patty Hearst, who joined her captors’ cause after months of confinement. In others, the bond may be subtler, marked by reluctance to escape or a lingering defense of the abuser long after the ordeal ends.

The syndrome’s prevalence extends beyond high-profile hostage cases. It has been observed in contexts like domestic violence, human trafficking, and cult dynamics, where power imbalances and prolonged captivity mirror the conditions of a hostage situation. Critics, however, argue that Stockholm Syndrome is overdiagnosed or misused as a catch-all explanation for victim behavior. Some suggest it pathologizes natural responses to trauma, while others question whether it’s a distinct phenomenon or simply an extension of existing psychological principles.

Culturally, Stockholm Syndrome has permeated popular media, from films like Beauty and the Beast—where Belle’s affection for her captor echoes the syndrome’s dynamics—to true-crime documentaries exploring real-life cases. This fascination underscores a broader human curiosity about the limits of empathy and resilience. Why would someone love their tormentor? The answer lies in the brain’s remarkable ability to adapt, even in the face of unimaginable adversity.

In conclusion, Stockholm Syndrome remains a compelling enigma, bridging psychology, criminology, and sociology. It highlights the lengths to which the human mind will go to survive, revealing both its fragility and its strength. While it may never be fully understood, the syndrome serves as a poignant reminder of the complex interplay between fear, dependency, and connection—a testament to the unpredictable nature of human behavior under duress.

From a political perspective, the idea that Hindus in Bharat (India) might be experiencing something akin to Stockholm Syndrome is a controversial but recurring theme in certain ideological discussions. The argument typically revolves around how Hindus, despite being the majority, often face political, legal, and ideological challenges that critics claim disfavor them in their own country. Here’s a breakdown of this perspective:

1. Political & Legal Asymmetry

• Article 30 vs. Article 29: Religious minorities (Muslims, Christians, etc.) have exclusive rights to establish and administer educational institutions, whereas Hindus do not get the same autonomy.

• Temple Control vs. Church & Mosque Autonomy: Many Hindu temples are under government control, with their revenues managed by the state, whereas churches and mosques are free from such interference.

• Anti-Conversion Laws Controversy: Laws against forced religious conversions exist in some states, but critics argue they are not strictly enforced, and large-scale conversions of Hindus still occur, often due to economic incentives.

2. Media & Intellectual Narrative

• A significant section of India's media and academia has historically been influenced by Marxist and Nehruvian secular ideologies, which many argue have led to a distorted portrayal of Hindu history and culture.

• While the injustices faced by Hindus (e.g., Kashmiri Pandit exodus, Bengal violence, and forced conversions) are downplayed, any criticism of minority communities is labeled as "communal" or "intolerant."

• The education system, until recently, focused on glorifying Mughal and colonial rulers, while indigenous Hindu contributions were either downplayed or framed negatively.

3. Political Landscape & Vote Bank Politics

• Many argue that Hindus have been divided on caste and regional lines, preventing them from voting as a unified political bloc the way some minority communities do.

• Political parties have openly courted minority votes through appeasement policies, such as subsidies, reservations, and targeted welfare schemes, while Hindu concerns (such as Sabarimala, Ram Mandir, or temple autonomy) are met with resistance.

• Some governments have criminalized Hindu festivals and traditions, imposing restrictions on firecrackers, Holi, and Diwali, while allowing practices like mass animal sacrifice during Bakrid without similar scrutiny.

4. Cultural & Psychological Impact

• The glorification of invaders like Aurangzeb, Tipu Sultan, and British colonial rule in school textbooks has led to generations being taught a diluted version of history, where Hindus are portrayed as passive victims or collaborators rather than resistors.

• The fear of being labeled communal or right-wing has led many Hindus, especially urban elites, to self-censor their views, despite being the majority.

• Even after centuries of oppression—first by Islamic rulers, then by British colonialists—Hindus continue to seek validation from the same forces that once ruled over them.

5. Changing Political Trends

• With leaders like Modi, there has been a growing assertion of Hindu identity in politics, which has led to counterattacks from the so-called secular and left-liberal factions.

• The rise of pro-Hindu policies, Ram Mandir construction, and removal of Article 370 suggests that Hindus are now moving out of a Stockholm Syndrome phase and reclaiming their political and cultural rights.

• However, critics argue that deep-rooted colonial-era laws and elite institutions still act as barriers to full Hindu assertion.

Conclusion

The claim that Hindus suffer from Stockholm Syndrome in a political sense is not entirely baseless, but it is evolving. There has been a visible shift in awareness and assertion, particularly in the last decade, with a growing recognition of historical wrongs, institutional bias, and political appeasement.

Read... O my Hindu brothers and sisters of Bharat...

Wake up and awaken others...

Reclaiming Who we are...

Whoever controls the climate - controls the Universe - Geoengineering is real and devilish...

Hey, people of Universe... 

#WakeUp or else you will be treated as guinea pigs by the globalists.

Watch this documentary on GeoEngineering.

There are two main types of geoengineering:

- Solar Radiation Management (SRM) – 

Techniques aimed at reflecting sunlight to cool the Earth. Examples include:

- Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) – Spraying fine particles (like sulfur dioxide) into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight.

- Cloud Seeding – Spraying silver iodide or other substances into clouds to induce rainfall.

- Marine Cloud Brightening – Increasing cloud reflectivity by spraying sea salt into the air.

- Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) – 

Techniques to capture and store CO₂ from the atmosphere. Examples include:

- Direct Air Capture (DAC) – Using machines to pull CO₂ from the air and store it underground.

- Ocean Fertilization – Adding nutrients (like iron) to oceans to enhance algae growth, which absorbs CO₂.

China, the U.S., and Russia have actively experimented with weather modification for decades. Cloud seeding has been used in China for rain enhancement, especially before events like the 2008 Olympics. The U.S. has explored weather control for military and agricultural purposes.

The "Dim the Sun" project is a solar geoengineering, specifically Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI), which aims to reduce global warming by reflecting sunlight away from Earth. A notable initiative related to this is the SCoPEx (Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment), a Harvard University project funded in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The idea is to release tiny reflective particles (aerosols), such as sulfur dioxide, into the stratosphere.

These particles would mimic volcanic eruptions (like Mount Pinatubo in 1991), which temporarily cooled the Earth.

The goal is to reduce solar radiation and slow down global warming.

Huh... Man is trying to act as God... here's the basic problem...

Wake up.... people of Universe, before it's too late.

Vision of a leader matters a lot - Bharat is lucky to get Modiji at the helm...

The foresightedness... the vision of a greater Bharat - the planning which started with the first foreign trip of Modiji after becoming Prime Minister of Bharat to Bhutan in the year 2014 is yielding positive results.

The visionary B2B... Bharat to Bhutan...

Joint Statement on the State Visit of Prime Minister of India to Bhutan

 March 22, 2024

Bharat and Bhutan: Together for Progress and Development

1. Over centuries, Bharat and Bhutan have enjoyed close bonds of friendship and cooperation anchored in mutual trust, goodwill and understanding. Our cultural links and common geography connect us. Strong economic and financial ties bind us. The close friendship between people of Bharat and Bhutan lies at the heart of our friendship. The relations between our two nations are an example of exceptional neighbourly ties.

2. The enduring partnership between our two nations is anchored in our common values as well as our shared cultural and spiritual heritage. Bharat for Bhutan and Bhutan for Bharat is an abiding reality of the region, nurtured by the enlightened vision of successive Druk Gyalpos of Bhutan and the political leadership in India and Bhutan.

3. We express satisfaction with the cooperation between our two countries related to our mutual security. We agree to continue with our close coordination and cooperation with each other on issues relating to our national interests.

4. Together, we will pursue a transformative partnership that advances our unique and special relations. This includes promoting connectivity in its broadest form physical connectivity through rail links, roads, air, waterways, trade infrastructure for seamless cross-border movement of goods and services, economic as well as digital connectivity.

5. Since Bhutan’s First Five Year Plan in 1961, India’s development partnership with Bhutan has been empowering the people and ensuring development across sectors and regions. Our development partnership is a confluence of India’s approach of ‘Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas’ and the philosophy of Gross National Happiness in Bhutan. We will continue to expand our development partnership in line with the priorities of the people and the Government of Bhutan, and the vision of His Majesty.

6. Our energy cooperation is a visible illustration of deep economic engagement, which results in mutually beneficial outcomes. We will continue to expand our clean energy partnership in the sectors of hydropower, solar and green hydrogen and jointly develop new projects, which channel our technological prowess, vibrancy of the business sector, and skilled talent of both countries to enhance energy security in the region. In this regard, we welcome the Joint Vision Statement on India-Bhutan Energy Partnership.

7. As our nations undergo profound digital and technological transformation, our joint endeavour will be to harness technologies for rapid economic growth and promoting the well-being of the two peoples. We will intensify our engagement in niche sectors of space technology, digital public infrastructure, start-ups, Artificial Intelligence, Clean Energy, STEM research and education and digital skills development.

8. We will strengthen trade and investment linkages with each other, particularly through the private sector, including in the context of His Majesty’s vision to develop the Gelephu Special Administrative Region, which will lead to greater economic connectivity in the region in a sustainable manner, promote economic partnerships and bring the people of Bharat and Bhutan closer.

9. Excellent people-to-people relations provide the foundation for our exceptional bilateral ties. We will nurture our people to people linkages by promoting exchanges of scholars, academics, tourists, students, youth, sport persons. We will continue to nurture our spiritual and cultural affinities including through visits of people to revered cultural heritage sites in each others’ countries.

10. We recognize the imperative of accelerating our partnership in sectors which promote youth development through education, skilling, entrepreneurship, technology, sports and creative and cultural industries. The Bharat-Bhutan partnership will respond to the dreams and aspirations of our youth for a better future.

11. Bharat has entered a new chapter in its history, one which is characterised by rapid socio-economic progress and technological advancements, and striving to become a developed nation by 2047 in the Amrit Kaal. Bhutan has the vision to become a high-income nation by 2034 and is embarking on a new phase in its economic development. In the common quest for progress and prosperity, Bharat and Bhutan will continue to be the closest of friends and partners.

Thimphu
March 22, 2024

The more we watch the moves of Modiji, the more we will learn about true statesmanship.

Thank you, sir, for taking the onus of making Bharat The Vishwaguru - without expecting anything back from us.

I respect you.

The young leaders of Bharat must analyse to learn the vision of Modi sir - a true leader.

The greater Bharat is work in progress... it's just a matter of time...

The plunderer of Bharatmata - teach your children not how we got back Freedom... but how we lost it...

"After the Battle of Plassey “the shower of wealth fell copiously on the company and its servants, A sum of 800 thousand pounds sterling, in coined silver, was sent down to Fort William. ‘Trade revival and the signs of affluence appeared in every English house.”
Capital accumulation and Industrial Revolution in England followed capital depletion and industrial devolution in India. As Brook Adams rightly remarks “In themselves inventions are passive, many of the most important having lain dormant for centuries waiting for a sufficient store of force to have accumulated to set them working....Before the influx of the Indian treasure and the expansion of credit which followed, no force sufficient for this existed and had
Watt lived fifty years earlier, he and his invention must have perished together.” In 1841 Labouchere, British Chancellor of the Exchequer, stated “The British have utterly destroyed the manufactures of India by their manufactures. The district of Dacca, the Manchester of India, has dwindled into insignificance.”

And with the aid of this loot, Britain vanquished Napoleon and built her political supremacy in the world."

O my Hindu brothers and sisters - accumulate knowledge and become a force to reckon with.

Come ON... guys ... wake up.

Read... Read...

The Ruin that Britain Wrought...

O my Bharatmata.... the blind sheep like Hindus have done terrific injustice to our true freedom fighters - will you pardon them? The untold story of Chandrasekhar Azad...

Taken from a Twitter thread...

“O old woman, don't come here, your son was a thief-dacoit, so the Goras killed him, the Bhil standing there laughingly said to an old woman wrapped in a dirty dhoti who was collecting wood in the forest.”

No, Chandu has sacrificed his life for freedom, said the old woman proudly. The name of that elderly woman was Jagrani Devi. This mother lovingly called that son Chandu and the world freed him”. Yes, we all know him by the name of Chandrashekhar Azad.

After father's death, Azad's poor destitute old mother instead of reaching out to anyone, used to collect wood and cow-dung from the forests and kept feeding herself by selling sticks and wood. Shameful thing is that his condition continued till 2 yrs (1949) after independence.

After this, Sadashiv ji brought her with him to Jhansi, keeping his promise with Chandrashekhar Azad, but his house was very small, so he arranged for Azad's mother to stay at the house of another friend of Azad, Bhagwan Das Mahore. Managed and served them.

In March 1951, when Azad's mother Jagrani Devi died in Jhansi, Sadashiv ji himself performed her last rites. After the death of Azad's mother, the people of Jhansi built a bench in her memory at a public place in her name.

The then Congress government of the state declared this construction as an illegal and illegal work done by the people of Jhansi. But the citizens of Jhansi decided to install the statue of Chandrashekhar Azad's mother, not giving importance to that mandate of the government.

When the government came to know that the statue of Azad's mother has been prepared and many former revolutionaries including Sadashiv Rao, Rupnarayan, Bhagwan Das Mahor are going to install the statue with the help of the people of Jhansi.

So he declared the establishment of the statue of the immortal martyr Chandrashekhar Azad's Matashree as a threat to the country, society and law and order of Jhansi and banned the program of establishment and imposed curfew in the entire Jhansi city.

But the public and the revolutionaries together set out to install the statue of Azad's mother. The then government, shocked by this horrendous flying on the streets of Jhansi under its order, ordered its police to shoot Sadashiv.

But keeping the statue of Azad's mother on his head, Sadashiv, who was moving towards the back, was surrounded by the public from all sides. Then the police lathi-charged the procession. Hundreds of people were injured, dozens were crippled and some even died.

The statue of Chandrashekhar Azad's mother could not be installed. Even 5 feet of land was not found in the country for a 2-3 feet statue of that great mother for whom Azad had sacrificed his life.

If even after knowing all such untold stories of the paradox called Indian Freedom Struggles, your blood does not boil.... u better remain a blind sheep - don't project yourselves as progenies of Ram, Krishna, Arjun, Bhisma, or Rana Pratap and Shivaji...

Hey Hindus of Bharat.... please wake up...

Jai Hind...

Read ON...

Sabkuch dikhta nahin hai - part II - Not everything is visible...

ANTI-INDIA CABAL IN U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT MANIPULATED ONLINE DISCOURSE ON PM MODI

People of Bharat... It's good that Modiji and BJP survived and emerged as winner in three consecutive elections - but the threat was real. 

I have taken a cue from Mike Benz, a free internet lover.

Join the dots backward.... everything will be clear.

Starting from the limited sharing option of Whatsapp to USAID funding to various so-called mis-information companies' sudden birth in Bharat during 2019.

Sab kuch dikhta nahi hain...

Wake up.... Hindus of Bharat....

Read ON...

From Mike Benz...

Director of the Foundation for Freedom Online (FFO), a non-profit watchdog dedicated to protecting digital liberties and restoring the free and open Internet. Previously. I was in charge of the cyber and "Big Tech" portfolios for the US State Department. where I served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Communications and Information Technology. That role included formulating and negotiating US policy on cyber issues as well as in- terfacing with private industry and civil society in the Big Tech space.

Prior to this, I served as a White House speechwriter for President Trump and advised on tech matters. Before that, I served as speechwriter to Housing and Urban Development Secretary Dr Ben Carson and was a policy adviser on economic development. Before my roles in the public sector, I practised business law for seven years as an attorney in New York. primarily representing technology companies and financial firms.

Where were you posted and in what position when these alleged interference occurred? 

A: If you're talking about US tech platforms interfering with the free flow of political information in India. that started before my time at the State Department. In late 2018/early 2019, the US-UK foreign policy establishment began a campaign to paint Modi's political success as being the result of "misinformation" online. For instance:

BBC: Nationalism a driving force behind fake news in India, research shows (Nov 2018)

*Time: How Volunteers for India's Ruling Party Are Using WhatsApp to Fuel Fake News Ahead of Elections (January 2019) 

*Quartz: There's no stopping fake news in India when the prime minister's

of the United States. 

New York Times: India Has a Public Health Crisis. It's Called Fake News (April 2019)

The Atlantic: MISINFORMATION IS ENDANGERING INDIA'S ELECTION (April 2019)

"Misinformation" is a censorship predicate. When the US foreign policy establishment says a foreign country has a "misinformation crisis," that is a cue to US tech companies to work with entities like the State Department's Global Engagement Center or cut-out think tanks like the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensics Research Lab or counter misinformation USAID fundees to censor the "mis information" in that foreign country.

Q: What was the modus operand that was put in play?

They censored chat apps like WhatsApp because Modi supporters were spreading pro-Modi messages there.

Poynter Institute: Inside WhatsApp's battle against misinformation in India (Dee 2018)

BBC: Whats App blocks two million Indian accounts (July 2021)

The US foreign policy establishment leaned on Facebook, which owns WhatsApp, very heavily to limit the amount of WhatsApp messages that could be shared, which would therefore limit the amount of pro-Modi content that could circulate in India (Modi supporters dispro- portionately shared con- tent on WhatsApp).

Like here, you can see in January 2019 WhatsApp started limiting sharing in India explicitly to stop Modi's misinformation" sharing

CNN: WhatsApp tightens limit on the number of people you can share messages with (Jan 2019)

When I was at the State Department. I saw all these same think tanks like the "Atlantic Council" were inundating me and my policy peers with recommendations to promote censoring "misinformation" abroad in so-called "nationalist or "authoritarian" governments. Modi's name was always circulated in lists that hit my inbox of places where US tech companies should be more aggressively engaged in "content moderation" (meaning censorship).

Which tech companies were involved in this? And why were they doing it? 

Facebook, WhatsApp. YouTube, Twitter, and probably others, but I do not want to speculate beyond that.

Q: Were the US government agencies, including the State Department, aware of this interference to defeat BJP and Modi?

A: That was not my direct portfolio, so I cannot answer that. It would be surprising to me if the State Department's Global Engagement Center was not talking to and placing pressure on US tech company liaisons to fa cilitate censorship of Modi BJP in India. The State Department keeps close tabs on social media influence of political parties and when they are hostile to a foreign leader, they tend to let US tech companies know early and often.

Q During that time, President Trump, who had an excellent equation with Prime Minister Modi, was in power. So bow do you explain this dichotomy? Was the State Department and other agencies working inde- pendently against their boss (Trump)?

A: Yes. Trump had very little influence over the rank-and-file of the State Department. There were many pockets of rogue factions that simply never accepted Trump's foreign policy and did not even pretend to 

accept Trump was their boss. 

Q: Did you come across any evidence that suggests other India-based political entities were coordinating with these tech companies in order to impact BJP's and Modi's poll campaign?

Not directly, it wasn't my direct portfolio. But I'm sure you can look up all the little counter-misin- formation companies that popped up in India and see to what extent they got State Department or USAID funding.